Jen left a comment on yesterday's post and it reminded me of my favorite chipmunk story--and when I searched this blog, I didn't find it. I'm amazed that I never wrote this down, so here goes:
I have talked a lot about the critters we have in our yard--AND house--and what has caused some of the most frustration for me is the chipmunks. When we first moved to this house, we thought it was cute to feed the buggers. And they became so tame that they would climb into your lap to be hand fed. The Oldest was just a toddler at the time, so I figured THAT wasn't a good thing and we stopped the feedings. Of course--as I said in the last post--they just helped themselves from the bird feeders, so they reproduced like crazy. You know those nature shows that have prairie dogs in them? Where you see their little heads popping out of the holes? That's pretty much what our backyard is like, only with chipmunks. And, of course, they get in the house and eat our gardens. They drive us crazy and have done so for far too many years.
One day when The Youngest was still at home, she had had enough of the chipmunks. All summer long the feeders had to be filled daily, the birds weren't coming to the feeders hardly at all, and the chipmunks were LAUGHING at us whenever we 'shooed' them. After a day of yelling, banging on the window, and doing whatever else she could think of to scare the critters, The Youngest decided to start throwing things at the little rodent. The chipmunk DUCKED when she threw things at it and went right back to filling its pouches with sunflower seed. The more the chipmunk defied her, the more incensed The Youngest became. Finally, with her face as red as Santa's suit, she screamed, "I AM going to get that thing!" and went running out the door with the spray bottle full of water. She got within two feet of the chipmunk and, like a gunslinger from the Old West, pulled out the bottle, aimed, and fired directly in the chipmunk's face/body. (They are small, so the spray went everywhere.) I watched from the breakfast nook window, so I can swear this is the truth: Instead of running away from the water, the chipmunk sat up and raised it's arm and started cleaning its pits. Yes, she gave him a much-needed shower instead of scaring him off. To say The Youngest was thisclose to going postal, is putting it mildly. I thought the poor thing was going to have a stroke, she was so mad. And I laughed until I peed myself. :D
That would be my favorite chipmunk story.
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
This One's For The Birds
I love watching birds. I'm not what would be thought of as a 'bird-watcher,' as I don't leave my house to watch them. My watching is done from my breakfast nook window and that's about all. I put up bird feeders and we attract quite a few species that way, so I am a happy little bird-watcher.
For many years, I left the feeders up year-round. It was the only way for me to get up-close-and-personal with summer birds like orioles and indigo buntings, which I see far too seldom. Unfortunately, we have chipmunks and that caused K to take the feeders down halfway through the summer a couple of years ago. If you don't know chipmunks, here are a few facts: They will empty a feeder of 2 pounds of seed in less than a couple of hours. They don't EAT what they take, they just hide the stuff for the winter--and they never remember where they put the food. That is why we have sunflowers growing all over our yard during the summer--and the only reason we don't have a field of sunflowers is the fact that we have the lawn cut regularly. Chipmunks rival rabbits in the fertility department--every year it seems as if there are another dozen that we have to deal with--they are no fun to have in the house and they dig holes/tunnels all through our backyard. And of all of the species we have roaming our yard--and that includes deer, rabbits, raccoons, skunks--the chipmunks do the most damage to our gardens. K didn't even do any planting last year because everything the year before was ruined by those little rodents. He is getting very frustrated and we don't know what to do about it. You can't discharge a firearm in the city limits--and that includes BB guns--so we can't kill them that way. Poison is not an option, because there are far too many pets that (illegally) roam, so we don't want to hurt them. And trapping just won't work--there are too many chipmunks. Our biggest problem is our neighbors: They feed the damn things year-round, so, of course, they are well-fed and have NO desire to leave the neighborhood.
So, back to what I was writing about. This past fall I decided--after a year without--I wanted my bird feeders in place for the winter. I waited until it was obvious that the chipmunks were underground for the season and placed four feeders on the posts/shepherd hooks, along with my two window feeders. All winter long I had a steady stream of chickadees and finches, with blue jays and a few other species showing up at times. But, I only needed to fill the feeders (I have very large ones, by the way) once for the entire winter, as there weren't all that many birds eating. And suddenly, about two weeks ago, the dam burst, so to speak. Since the day before our last heavy snowfall, we have had the following in the backyard: starlings, juncos, goldfinches, house finches, purple finches, blue jays, mourning doves, chickadees, nuthatches, woodpeckers, and cardinals. And there have been days when most, if not all, of these species have visited during the same day. I don't know where they all came from, but it certainly has been fun to have so much activity again. I will enjoy this while I can, because it is going to be pretty short-lived: the chipmunks have come out of hiding and will begin gathering their food supply for next winter, any day now. And K will put my feeders away for another six months.
For many years, I left the feeders up year-round. It was the only way for me to get up-close-and-personal with summer birds like orioles and indigo buntings, which I see far too seldom. Unfortunately, we have chipmunks and that caused K to take the feeders down halfway through the summer a couple of years ago. If you don't know chipmunks, here are a few facts: They will empty a feeder of 2 pounds of seed in less than a couple of hours. They don't EAT what they take, they just hide the stuff for the winter--and they never remember where they put the food. That is why we have sunflowers growing all over our yard during the summer--and the only reason we don't have a field of sunflowers is the fact that we have the lawn cut regularly. Chipmunks rival rabbits in the fertility department--every year it seems as if there are another dozen that we have to deal with--they are no fun to have in the house and they dig holes/tunnels all through our backyard. And of all of the species we have roaming our yard--and that includes deer, rabbits, raccoons, skunks--the chipmunks do the most damage to our gardens. K didn't even do any planting last year because everything the year before was ruined by those little rodents. He is getting very frustrated and we don't know what to do about it. You can't discharge a firearm in the city limits--and that includes BB guns--so we can't kill them that way. Poison is not an option, because there are far too many pets that (illegally) roam, so we don't want to hurt them. And trapping just won't work--there are too many chipmunks. Our biggest problem is our neighbors: They feed the damn things year-round, so, of course, they are well-fed and have NO desire to leave the neighborhood.
So, back to what I was writing about. This past fall I decided--after a year without--I wanted my bird feeders in place for the winter. I waited until it was obvious that the chipmunks were underground for the season and placed four feeders on the posts/shepherd hooks, along with my two window feeders. All winter long I had a steady stream of chickadees and finches, with blue jays and a few other species showing up at times. But, I only needed to fill the feeders (I have very large ones, by the way) once for the entire winter, as there weren't all that many birds eating. And suddenly, about two weeks ago, the dam burst, so to speak. Since the day before our last heavy snowfall, we have had the following in the backyard: starlings, juncos, goldfinches, house finches, purple finches, blue jays, mourning doves, chickadees, nuthatches, woodpeckers, and cardinals. And there have been days when most, if not all, of these species have visited during the same day. I don't know where they all came from, but it certainly has been fun to have so much activity again. I will enjoy this while I can, because it is going to be pretty short-lived: the chipmunks have come out of hiding and will begin gathering their food supply for next winter, any day now. And K will put my feeders away for another six months.
Monday, March 14, 2011
Monday
For someone that doesn't work outside the home, Monday shouldn't be a dreaded day. But, in my case, that isn't true. I hate Mondays.
Back when the girls were home, Mondays were always 'that day'--you know, the day when you had to 'get back to business.' I have always been a night owl, so having to get up with the girls on Monday morning was pure hell. I never was so happy as when the girls finally were old enough to navigate by themselves in the morning. Don't get me wrong, I still got up with them, I just didn't have to actually DO anything to get them out the door--a major blessing for me. K has never been a 'Monday-Friday, 9-5' worker, so he is just as apt to be home on Monday as he is at work. He never was part of my 'I hate Monday' problems.
These days, the major reason to hate Monday is it is GARBAGE DAY. Any other day of the week would be better for me to have to do garbage, but we are scheduled for Monday. Gathering the garbage isn't a particular favorite of mine, but to have to do it on Monday just makes it that much more of a chore. And I have no explanation for why it bothers me so much.
Because of Monday being garbage day, that also makes it 'do a bit more cleaning' day. If I have to clean windows or clean out the refrigerator, it has to be done on Monday, so that all of the extra trash/garbage can be thrown out. Anything that will make more garbage gets done on Monday, so that it can be put to the curb that night.
For whatever reason, there almost always seems to be phone calls that need to be made on Monday. Saturday's mail inevitably brings a bill or other letter that needs 'taking care of' on Monday. When was the last time you made a call to any type of business on a Monday? If you don't HAVE to do it, I say don't. I've even had my doctor's office tell me NOT to call on Monday--and they don't want me showing up in the office unless I have an appointment. People can be downright nasty on Mondays.
I hate being part of a cliche, but there we are: I hate Mondays. And I have no REAL reason to feel like this. So, does anyone LIKE Mondays?
Back when the girls were home, Mondays were always 'that day'--you know, the day when you had to 'get back to business.' I have always been a night owl, so having to get up with the girls on Monday morning was pure hell. I never was so happy as when the girls finally were old enough to navigate by themselves in the morning. Don't get me wrong, I still got up with them, I just didn't have to actually DO anything to get them out the door--a major blessing for me. K has never been a 'Monday-Friday, 9-5' worker, so he is just as apt to be home on Monday as he is at work. He never was part of my 'I hate Monday' problems.
These days, the major reason to hate Monday is it is GARBAGE DAY. Any other day of the week would be better for me to have to do garbage, but we are scheduled for Monday. Gathering the garbage isn't a particular favorite of mine, but to have to do it on Monday just makes it that much more of a chore. And I have no explanation for why it bothers me so much.
Because of Monday being garbage day, that also makes it 'do a bit more cleaning' day. If I have to clean windows or clean out the refrigerator, it has to be done on Monday, so that all of the extra trash/garbage can be thrown out. Anything that will make more garbage gets done on Monday, so that it can be put to the curb that night.
For whatever reason, there almost always seems to be phone calls that need to be made on Monday. Saturday's mail inevitably brings a bill or other letter that needs 'taking care of' on Monday. When was the last time you made a call to any type of business on a Monday? If you don't HAVE to do it, I say don't. I've even had my doctor's office tell me NOT to call on Monday--and they don't want me showing up in the office unless I have an appointment. People can be downright nasty on Mondays.
I hate being part of a cliche, but there we are: I hate Mondays. And I have no REAL reason to feel like this. So, does anyone LIKE Mondays?
Sunday, March 13, 2011
Not For Me
I am always amazed at companies that charge extremely high prices for their products and then want customers to PAY for their catalogs, as well. Kind of reeks of arrogance, I would say.
Saturday, March 12, 2011
All The President's Men
The other night I was channel surfing and came across the movie 'All The President's Men' on one of the movie channels. It is the story of how the Washington Post--namely, Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward--broke the story of the Watergate scandal. I remember when I saw it the first time--I was wowed by the performances of Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford. Actually, to be perfectly honest, I was wowed by Redford--how gorgeous he was in this movie. Those were the years when he was his most-beautiful. ;) Anyway, I love to watch old movies and compare my feelings about them NOW as to how I felt THEN. And this movie definitely has me looking at things in a different way from what I did at the time.
First off, let me say that Richard Nixon was not then, nor is now, my favorite President. (Actually, I can't find one to accept as 'favorite,' as my assessment of the Presidents seems to change as the years go by.) As hard as this is to say, I could never accept him as trustworthy because of his looks--he always seemed to have a bit of a weasly look to him and never looked honest. At the time of his 'take down,' I was front and center cheering and applauding. I thought there had never been a more crooked person to hold the office of POTUS and thought the man got much less than he deserved for what he did. Today, I don't have quite as harsh feelings about him.
Without turning this into a Republican vs Democrat--or liberal vs conservative--thing, I do believe Nixon wouldn't have been pursued so doggedly by the Washington Post if he had not been Republican. (This is the same as conservative reporters 'going after' Barack these days.) The Post--and Ben Bradlee--were VERY liberal and I believe they delighted in doing what they could to smear Nixon in any possible way. That he actually WAS dirty, made it so much better. Also, if he wouldn't have LOOKED so damn guilty... But, I don't believe Nixon was much different from any other POTUS that has been, is, or will be--he just happened to be the one that got caught.
Years ago there was a 'gentlemen's agreement' about what would and would not be printed about the POTUS. Roosevelt was never photographed--or the photos were never published--sitting in his wheelchair. The wheelchair could have given the suggestion of weakness and that wasn't a good way for the POTUS to be seen. Even though JFK was a womanizer and his numerous affairs were some of the worst kept secrets in Washington, the papers never mentioned the fact--because there was respect shown to the office. This is no longer the case and hasn't been for some time. Some people think the internet and 24-hour news networks are the reason for this, but it has been a much longer time coming than that. A good reason for this is the fact that, as a society, there has been a breakdown in common decency and respect. Plain and simple.
It is human nature to want our leaders to be 'perfect,' or, at the very least, better than we are. Before TV, the internet, etc, it was much easier for us to believe that those in the public eye were (or could have been) a step above us in every aspect. Of course, we know better today. There are very few people that show any sign of being even a little bit better than 'only human.' And too often, we won't give our leaders the courtesy of being 'only human.' Every one of us has something in our past that we wouldn't want examined in the cold light of day, but most of us are lucky enough to not see our mistakes talked about on the 6 O'clock News. Unfortunately, because of the nit-picking ways of the 'opposition,' far too many highly qualified people won't even try to become elected officials. And that is a crying shame. Isn't it time that we allow our leaders to be human and make mistakes? Can't we forgive youthful indiscretions? Couldn't we look at how good of a leader a person could be and ignore a mistake from the past? Or should we expect more from them? I don't really know the answer, but I'm afraid that our best potential leaders will never step forward because of the unattainable standards we set for others, and can't come close to in our own lives.
First off, let me say that Richard Nixon was not then, nor is now, my favorite President. (Actually, I can't find one to accept as 'favorite,' as my assessment of the Presidents seems to change as the years go by.) As hard as this is to say, I could never accept him as trustworthy because of his looks--he always seemed to have a bit of a weasly look to him and never looked honest. At the time of his 'take down,' I was front and center cheering and applauding. I thought there had never been a more crooked person to hold the office of POTUS and thought the man got much less than he deserved for what he did. Today, I don't have quite as harsh feelings about him.
Without turning this into a Republican vs Democrat--or liberal vs conservative--thing, I do believe Nixon wouldn't have been pursued so doggedly by the Washington Post if he had not been Republican. (This is the same as conservative reporters 'going after' Barack these days.) The Post--and Ben Bradlee--were VERY liberal and I believe they delighted in doing what they could to smear Nixon in any possible way. That he actually WAS dirty, made it so much better. Also, if he wouldn't have LOOKED so damn guilty... But, I don't believe Nixon was much different from any other POTUS that has been, is, or will be--he just happened to be the one that got caught.
Years ago there was a 'gentlemen's agreement' about what would and would not be printed about the POTUS. Roosevelt was never photographed--or the photos were never published--sitting in his wheelchair. The wheelchair could have given the suggestion of weakness and that wasn't a good way for the POTUS to be seen. Even though JFK was a womanizer and his numerous affairs were some of the worst kept secrets in Washington, the papers never mentioned the fact--because there was respect shown to the office. This is no longer the case and hasn't been for some time. Some people think the internet and 24-hour news networks are the reason for this, but it has been a much longer time coming than that. A good reason for this is the fact that, as a society, there has been a breakdown in common decency and respect. Plain and simple.
It is human nature to want our leaders to be 'perfect,' or, at the very least, better than we are. Before TV, the internet, etc, it was much easier for us to believe that those in the public eye were (or could have been) a step above us in every aspect. Of course, we know better today. There are very few people that show any sign of being even a little bit better than 'only human.' And too often, we won't give our leaders the courtesy of being 'only human.' Every one of us has something in our past that we wouldn't want examined in the cold light of day, but most of us are lucky enough to not see our mistakes talked about on the 6 O'clock News. Unfortunately, because of the nit-picking ways of the 'opposition,' far too many highly qualified people won't even try to become elected officials. And that is a crying shame. Isn't it time that we allow our leaders to be human and make mistakes? Can't we forgive youthful indiscretions? Couldn't we look at how good of a leader a person could be and ignore a mistake from the past? Or should we expect more from them? I don't really know the answer, but I'm afraid that our best potential leaders will never step forward because of the unattainable standards we set for others, and can't come close to in our own lives.
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Passive Aggressivity At Its Best
In the (almost) 18 years that we have had our cat, we've been very lucky. Some people with animals are constantly trying to stop bad behaviors or make multiple trips to the vet's because of illness. Our cat has only been sick twice and, for the most part, her behavior is quite acceptable. Of course, she is the 'typical' feline: She believes this house is HERS and she allows US to live here. But, other than that, she has always been more of just a presence in the house than anything. Cats' independent nature is why I prefer them as pets above other animals. And our cat has been a pretty perfect example of that. However, she has learned new tricks as she has gotten older.
When we got our new furniture and I did the pre-Christmas cleaning in December, I moved furniture around in some rooms. Our upstairs bedroom is where the cat has found sanctuary for many, many years--a place she has preferred to be, as she doesn't really like people. Because I moved the bed up there, her favorite place to sleep was no longer--she liked to sleep under the bed with her back pressed up to the heat run. Her NEXT favorite place to sleep was under/behind the couch, with her back pressed up against the heat run. (I can't understand why she needs to be near direct heat, as half of her 15 pounds is fur.) I not only moved the couch so I could fit the Christmas tree in the living room, but the new one didn't have enough clearance for her to get under. Again, she needed to find a new favorite place. She finally has decided that under our bed is an acceptable sleeping area. Of course, this isn't her PREFERRED place--if she had her druthers, she would be sleeping ON our bed 24/7. And this is NOT going to happen.
With the new bed, I need to use a foot stool to climb up into it. The cat has learned that it is MUCH easier to get into bed by using the stool, too. She doesn't even try to jump up anymore--frankly, I think she is getting too old to jump that high comfortably. I have no problem with her coming into bed and sleeping with me, but I will not have her on my bed all day long. And I always move the foot stool when I get out of bed, so she doesn't have access to it until I go to bed the next time. And this doesn't make her happy.
I don't store things under my bed like a lot of people do. There is only ONE thing I keep there and that is the box my winter boots are in. It just is easier for me to get to the boots the few times I need them during the winter if they are under the bed. Under the bed has become the favorite place for the cat to sleep when she can't get on top of the bed. There is plenty of room there for any cat, even one that is big as ours, but she isn't satisfied. She lets me know, every day, that she would be much happier on top of the bed. Before settling down for one of her numerous daily naps, the cat pushes the box from under the bed, right into the center of the room, where I will be sure to see it--or trip over it, if I'm not careful. And she does this more than once a day. She has learned to take passive aggressive behavior to a completely new level.
When we got our new furniture and I did the pre-Christmas cleaning in December, I moved furniture around in some rooms. Our upstairs bedroom is where the cat has found sanctuary for many, many years--a place she has preferred to be, as she doesn't really like people. Because I moved the bed up there, her favorite place to sleep was no longer--she liked to sleep under the bed with her back pressed up to the heat run. Her NEXT favorite place to sleep was under/behind the couch, with her back pressed up against the heat run. (I can't understand why she needs to be near direct heat, as half of her 15 pounds is fur.) I not only moved the couch so I could fit the Christmas tree in the living room, but the new one didn't have enough clearance for her to get under. Again, she needed to find a new favorite place. She finally has decided that under our bed is an acceptable sleeping area. Of course, this isn't her PREFERRED place--if she had her druthers, she would be sleeping ON our bed 24/7. And this is NOT going to happen.
With the new bed, I need to use a foot stool to climb up into it. The cat has learned that it is MUCH easier to get into bed by using the stool, too. She doesn't even try to jump up anymore--frankly, I think she is getting too old to jump that high comfortably. I have no problem with her coming into bed and sleeping with me, but I will not have her on my bed all day long. And I always move the foot stool when I get out of bed, so she doesn't have access to it until I go to bed the next time. And this doesn't make her happy.
I don't store things under my bed like a lot of people do. There is only ONE thing I keep there and that is the box my winter boots are in. It just is easier for me to get to the boots the few times I need them during the winter if they are under the bed. Under the bed has become the favorite place for the cat to sleep when she can't get on top of the bed. There is plenty of room there for any cat, even one that is big as ours, but she isn't satisfied. She lets me know, every day, that she would be much happier on top of the bed. Before settling down for one of her numerous daily naps, the cat pushes the box from under the bed, right into the center of the room, where I will be sure to see it--or trip over it, if I'm not careful. And she does this more than once a day. She has learned to take passive aggressive behavior to a completely new level.
My cat, in her favorite position: Lying down. :D
Monday, March 07, 2011
What A Difference A Day Makes
The other day I suddenly realized something: I'm not depressed! This wasn't the first time this had occurred to me, but I think this WAS the first time I actually embraced the thought. I. AM. NOT. DEPRESSED! What a wonderful feeling--even though it didn't REALLY happen overnight. ;)
I haven't been shy about sharing my emotional problems--I have had several bouts of depression in the past and have dealt with it in different ways. I have been on medications for depression and have been in therapy--both of which helped to some extent. However, I believe the biggest factor in my 'recovery' came from the 'work' I did on my own.
As far as depression goes, I have had two bouts of post-partum depression and have suffered because of problems we had with our girls. (While the 'problems' we had are not as severe as other people might have experienced, 'problems' are whatever someone can handle. 'Problems' are a very subjective matter.) I think a good part of my last, severe depression came after the collapse--once again--of any support from The Family. It was hard enough dealing with incorrigible kids, but when you have no family support system to fall back on, it is easy to just fall apart. And fall apart I did. One day, about ten years ago, found me lying in the middle of the kitchen floor, in a fetal position, sobbing and moaning like a wounded animal. I honestly believe I had a small breakdown that day. How I got up from the floor and into bed after however many hours, I'll never know, but after some sleep, I believe I resolved to take charge of my life once and for all. And that is when my recovery began.
I don't know how my thought process worked in terms of getting me 'better.' I DO know that things changed drastically for me when I decided to get rid of 'toxic people' from my life. The day I decided to break ties with my parents and brother and his family, was the day I started to get emotionally healthy again. I consciously made up my mind to ignore The Family's blaming me for everything that 'went wrong' with my kids. Today, any guilt I might feel about whatever happened, is guilt I have placed on myself, by myself. I have never denied any culpability in the problems our family had, but I also will never take all of the blame--it was a two-way street, for sure. And in the middle of it all, was The Family doing a great job of acting like cops at the scene of an accident--they did a lot of 'traffic control' and were a big part of everything that transpired. For that, I HAD to get them out of my life--and the fact that they NEVER accepted any responsibility for their part in 'the troubles,' is reason enough for me to stay away from them. And stay away I have.
The last time I actually spoke words to The Brother was in January 2004. I saw him during the month of May 2008 for the last time. I saw The Father and Mother last year in May--and I last talked to The Mother a few months ago, which happened to be the first time since May. And in all honesty, I don't miss them. The Brother and The Mother aren't 'happy' in their lives unless they have big-time drama going on, and that is something I don't now, or ever, need in my life. The Mother is extremely manipulative and controlling--but she is so subtle that only people who know her as well as I do can see it--and The Brother has some serious mental-stability problems that I never think he will address. I'm happy to be rid of them.
So, do I ever miss The Family? Of course I do. The Mother was my best friend--I talked to her almost every day and we were 'on the same page' most of the time. Getting together with The Family could be the most fun I had in weeks--we had some great laughs while telling the family stories, etc. There ARE some good memories that I have to suppress, but they do come to the surface at times. Holidays and special occasions are sad for me sometimes--until I REALLY remember how they used to be.
Getting together with The Family was never as easy as it seemed. With The Brother's lack of control, you never knew if something said would make him have a 'temper tantrum,' start to scream and holler, and slam his way out of The Parent's house. (This he did on more than one occasion--usually because someone didn't agree with his views on a subject. And he is EXTREMELY frightening when he gets like this.) The Mother would work her subtle digs at me far too often--as in, "Gee, Jane has lost SO much weight! She looks WONDERFUL." as a way of telling me that I needed to lose weight. Also, her favoritism when it came to certain grandchildren was extremely apparent far too often--and The Youngest always came out wanting for the approval and attention that the others got. I don't need to put myself through this--as well as everything else I faced through the years.
To sum it all up, I'm feeling MUCH better now! If it wasn't for The Husband and some closer-than-sister friends who were then--and still are--in my corner, I don't know what would have happened to me. I am more grateful for them than words can ever say. The doctors and therapists that I saw--even the lousy ones--were part of my recovery, as well. Also, I never could have gotten through all that I have without my faith and God's help. This is something that I have always relied on and always could depend on. However, what works for one person doesn't necessarily work for another. If anyone would find themselves in the situation I was, my recommendation is this: See a doctor first, get on meds if you can, and find support of some sort. And trust your instincts--you might not like what your heart is telling you to do, but it might be for the best. (As long as it isn't destructive, of course.)
I haven't been shy about sharing my emotional problems--I have had several bouts of depression in the past and have dealt with it in different ways. I have been on medications for depression and have been in therapy--both of which helped to some extent. However, I believe the biggest factor in my 'recovery' came from the 'work' I did on my own.
As far as depression goes, I have had two bouts of post-partum depression and have suffered because of problems we had with our girls. (While the 'problems' we had are not as severe as other people might have experienced, 'problems' are whatever someone can handle. 'Problems' are a very subjective matter.) I think a good part of my last, severe depression came after the collapse--once again--of any support from The Family. It was hard enough dealing with incorrigible kids, but when you have no family support system to fall back on, it is easy to just fall apart. And fall apart I did. One day, about ten years ago, found me lying in the middle of the kitchen floor, in a fetal position, sobbing and moaning like a wounded animal. I honestly believe I had a small breakdown that day. How I got up from the floor and into bed after however many hours, I'll never know, but after some sleep, I believe I resolved to take charge of my life once and for all. And that is when my recovery began.
I don't know how my thought process worked in terms of getting me 'better.' I DO know that things changed drastically for me when I decided to get rid of 'toxic people' from my life. The day I decided to break ties with my parents and brother and his family, was the day I started to get emotionally healthy again. I consciously made up my mind to ignore The Family's blaming me for everything that 'went wrong' with my kids. Today, any guilt I might feel about whatever happened, is guilt I have placed on myself, by myself. I have never denied any culpability in the problems our family had, but I also will never take all of the blame--it was a two-way street, for sure. And in the middle of it all, was The Family doing a great job of acting like cops at the scene of an accident--they did a lot of 'traffic control' and were a big part of everything that transpired. For that, I HAD to get them out of my life--and the fact that they NEVER accepted any responsibility for their part in 'the troubles,' is reason enough for me to stay away from them. And stay away I have.
The last time I actually spoke words to The Brother was in January 2004. I saw him during the month of May 2008 for the last time. I saw The Father and Mother last year in May--and I last talked to The Mother a few months ago, which happened to be the first time since May. And in all honesty, I don't miss them. The Brother and The Mother aren't 'happy' in their lives unless they have big-time drama going on, and that is something I don't now, or ever, need in my life. The Mother is extremely manipulative and controlling--but she is so subtle that only people who know her as well as I do can see it--and The Brother has some serious mental-stability problems that I never think he will address. I'm happy to be rid of them.
So, do I ever miss The Family? Of course I do. The Mother was my best friend--I talked to her almost every day and we were 'on the same page' most of the time. Getting together with The Family could be the most fun I had in weeks--we had some great laughs while telling the family stories, etc. There ARE some good memories that I have to suppress, but they do come to the surface at times. Holidays and special occasions are sad for me sometimes--until I REALLY remember how they used to be.
Getting together with The Family was never as easy as it seemed. With The Brother's lack of control, you never knew if something said would make him have a 'temper tantrum,' start to scream and holler, and slam his way out of The Parent's house. (This he did on more than one occasion--usually because someone didn't agree with his views on a subject. And he is EXTREMELY frightening when he gets like this.) The Mother would work her subtle digs at me far too often--as in, "Gee, Jane has lost SO much weight! She looks WONDERFUL." as a way of telling me that I needed to lose weight. Also, her favoritism when it came to certain grandchildren was extremely apparent far too often--and The Youngest always came out wanting for the approval and attention that the others got. I don't need to put myself through this--as well as everything else I faced through the years.
To sum it all up, I'm feeling MUCH better now! If it wasn't for The Husband and some closer-than-sister friends who were then--and still are--in my corner, I don't know what would have happened to me. I am more grateful for them than words can ever say. The doctors and therapists that I saw--even the lousy ones--were part of my recovery, as well. Also, I never could have gotten through all that I have without my faith and God's help. This is something that I have always relied on and always could depend on. However, what works for one person doesn't necessarily work for another. If anyone would find themselves in the situation I was, my recommendation is this: See a doctor first, get on meds if you can, and find support of some sort. And trust your instincts--you might not like what your heart is telling you to do, but it might be for the best. (As long as it isn't destructive, of course.)
Sunday, March 06, 2011
Baggage Fees Kill Me
Five years ago, we were making plans to be in Niagara Falls for our Youngest's wedding at the end of the month. While everyone else that went to the wedding flew, K and I drove. Yes, the rest of the people did have to come from further west than us, but we got there in less than 10 hours, so they could have done it easily in a few more hours of driving. We did discuss the possibility of flying ourselves, but one thing stood in our way: I am the world's worst packer.
I hate to pack whenever we go on a trip--and I don't care if we're going for overnight or for 10 days! I think part of my problem is the fact that K doesn't help at all, which I wouldn't necessarily mind if he would only tell me WHAT he wanted me to pack. I always have to decide what I need for myself AND what he might need--and that isn't always an easy task. I would much rather pack during the winter months, as I ALWAYS know I need to take warm clothes. However, packing for the spring, summer, and fall months finds me taking three times as much clothing as I can ever hope to wear. With no promise of what weather I might face--don't forget, we can experience 50* temperature changes in 24 hours around here--I have to pack for hot AND cold whenever we travel. And that is why it is so much easier for us to drive: We have enough room to take all of our luggage.
It is getting too expensive to bring luggage when you travel by air. Period. As of right now, most airlines are NOT charging for carry-on bags, but with more and more people actually trying to get away with having to pay baggage fees, we'll see that change in no time. The last time we traveled by air, there was so much stuff in the overhead bins that I worried the doors wouldn't be able to close. And I saw so many people staggering into the plane under all of their carry-on junk, that I couldn't tell if they were men, women, or grizzly bears boarding. The airlines are not going to let this go on much longer. Considering the baggage fees for checked bags is now $20-25 dollars per the first two bags--and the fees jump drastically for the next bags--the cost for carry-ons will have to be in the $15-25 range when the fees are imposed. And that will add another $100--at the very least--to our travel expenses. Even with the cost of gas, it might be cheaper for us to continue traveling on land and not by air. But then, we could just save all of that money and stay home. Ugh.
I hate to pack whenever we go on a trip--and I don't care if we're going for overnight or for 10 days! I think part of my problem is the fact that K doesn't help at all, which I wouldn't necessarily mind if he would only tell me WHAT he wanted me to pack. I always have to decide what I need for myself AND what he might need--and that isn't always an easy task. I would much rather pack during the winter months, as I ALWAYS know I need to take warm clothes. However, packing for the spring, summer, and fall months finds me taking three times as much clothing as I can ever hope to wear. With no promise of what weather I might face--don't forget, we can experience 50* temperature changes in 24 hours around here--I have to pack for hot AND cold whenever we travel. And that is why it is so much easier for us to drive: We have enough room to take all of our luggage.
It is getting too expensive to bring luggage when you travel by air. Period. As of right now, most airlines are NOT charging for carry-on bags, but with more and more people actually trying to get away with having to pay baggage fees, we'll see that change in no time. The last time we traveled by air, there was so much stuff in the overhead bins that I worried the doors wouldn't be able to close. And I saw so many people staggering into the plane under all of their carry-on junk, that I couldn't tell if they were men, women, or grizzly bears boarding. The airlines are not going to let this go on much longer. Considering the baggage fees for checked bags is now $20-25 dollars per the first two bags--and the fees jump drastically for the next bags--the cost for carry-ons will have to be in the $15-25 range when the fees are imposed. And that will add another $100--at the very least--to our travel expenses. Even with the cost of gas, it might be cheaper for us to continue traveling on land and not by air. But then, we could just save all of that money and stay home. Ugh.
Saturday, March 05, 2011
Penis Envy
(Now that title should get this blog some hits! :D)
This isn't about penis envy in the way that Freud meant it. This post is all about how convenient 'penii'* are when it comes to peeing. How many women really never envied men for being able to pee standing up? I think the entire process is so much more simple and easy for men than it is for women, so in that aspect, I have penis envy. And, it seems as if a lot of women are like me.
This isn't about penis envy in the way that Freud meant it. This post is all about how convenient 'penii'* are when it comes to peeing. How many women really never envied men for being able to pee standing up? I think the entire process is so much more simple and easy for men than it is for women, so in that aspect, I have penis envy. And, it seems as if a lot of women are like me.
GoGirl is a product that has been designed to allow women to pee while standing up. Wow. It is supposed to be for women who camp--not me--women who travel to third world countries--not me--women who spend a great deal of time outdoors--not me. I would think of using this product when in some of the public bathrooms I have used, but I am very choosy about where I go, so it isn't that much of an issue for me. I just can imagine how other restroom patrons would react to a pair of feet standing TOWARDS the toilet in the stall and not away from it, as is the usual practice. (Let's face it, we do spend WAY too much time glancing under the stall doors when we go into a restroom.) I wonder if security would be called because someone thought a transvestite was in the women's? I could see using this in an airplane bathroom--or what I think an airplane bathroom is like. All of the times I have flown--not THAT much, actually--I have never used a bathroom on a plane. I just can't make myself do it.
The number one (no pun intended) time I would want to use this device is when I have to give a sample in the doctor's office. After all of these years--and two pregnancies--I have not mastered the technique of how to pee in a bottle without showering my hand, wrist, and lower arm with pee. I just can't do it. The biggest problem, though, is the sample has to be sterile and I don't think the GoGirl can be sterilized. Bummer.
While this isn't a TERRIBLE idea, I don't know how much usage I would get out of it. I AM a klutsy person, so I would probably wind up having to change my clothes after using this thing way too often. For the time being, I think I will pass. What about you?
*I know that isn't the proper plural of 'penis,' I just like the word better than 'penises.' :D
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Breasts and Other Lady Parts
There was a time, if someone (read that as 'a guy') wanted to touch my breasts (or look at them naked, for that matter), certain conditions had to be met. First, I had to know his name--and his entire history and genealogy. We had to have been together for a fair amount of time and we had to be in love. Considering I only have had three loves in my life, not many guys have seen 'the girls.' (So I have Puritanical morals--sue me! ;)) This is why what happened to me yesterday is so different than what has been 'usual' in my life. I allowed someone to poke and prod, stretch and knead, squeeze and hold my unclothed breasteses. I don't remember the person's name, I never saw her before, and I most likely will never see her again. Yes, I had my annual mammograms.
From what I understand, many women have a hard time going for mammograms. Some women are very emotional about the experience--The Mother cries like a baby, for example. Other women have a great deal of pain having the procedure done--my friend with the tiny boobies suffers greatly with the stretching of the skin. For me, the entire ordeal is quite routine and I never have had an entirely negative experience. (Now, I'm not saying that it is pleasant, by any means, it's just that I don't suffer a lot having this done.) I guess one of the things that has made this a process that I don't worry about is the fact I have only had one 'problem'* with a mammogram in all of the years I've had them done.
After having my annual 'squeeze,' I DO find myself thinking 'what if' until I get the 'all good' report. Of course, I've never been faced with deciding what to do in the case of breast cancer--or, thank God, ANY cancer--but I think about it from time to time. While many women tell their doctors to do everything that can be done to save their breast, I think I would go the opposite way and say "Get rid of the damn thing and make sure all of the cancer is GONE!" I'm not afraid to die--I got into this a few posts ago--but I am terrified of dying in pain. Cancer causes pain.
I've never sat down and had a heart-to-heart talk with a breast cancer survivor. I admire anyone who has battled through cancer and I would never judge, but for me, I cannot understand wanting to save a body part over a fool proof complete cure. But, some women feel as if their womanhood is somewhat diminished if some of their 'lady bits' go missing. Again, I'm not judging, it's just that I can't comprehend that. And I only have my own life to use as a gauge when I think about it.
At the age of 34, I decided to have a hysterectomy. I began having periods about the age of 11 or 12 and every year brought more problems with my reproductive system. I was the poster girl for bad, painful periods. In high school, there were times when I had to leave school because I was in such pain--and it wasn't anything I could hide. I would turn pale and find myself praying to the porcelain gods, heaving my guts out. Of course, this wasn't EVERY month. I could go several months with a fairly 'normal' period--just long enough to think I was getting better--and then I would get blasted all over again. Going to doctors didn't help much. I was given many different pain pills and one doctor even put me on amphetamines. Nothing helped. The only relief I ever got was when I'd find myself in the ER and the doctor ordered Demerol injections--that's goooood drugs. Of course, I couldn't be on Demerol every month, so the relief was short-lived. Finally, I was put on birth control pills. Everything changed for me then--and the biggest change was NO PAIN! I thought I had found the Holy Grail and I was ecstatic. For six months. And the pain started to come back. Going back to what was 'normal' for me came very gradually, but it was apparent that The Pill wasn't going to be my cure-all and I decided to quit taking it. This then brought me an entirely new set of problems. After I went off of The Pill, I would go for three months or so at a time without a period. To bring it on, I had to go to the doctor and get a prescription--if I wasn't pregnant, I'd get my period and if I WAS, then nothing would happen. With The Husband away sailing the Seven Seas, there was no chance of a pregnancy, so I took the pills. This happened to me after each of the two times in my life when I was on birth control pills--and it took me at least a year each time to get back to my 'normal' cycle after going off of the pills. It wasn't a fun time for me, at all.
Early on, the diagnosis of 'endometriosis' was suggested by a doctor. The only thing he told me was that everything would get better once I had gone through a pregnancy. And nothing more was said. I didn't think much more about this and without the interwebs available like they are now, I didn't have a place where I could do any research into this problem. I just tried to learn to live with it. Now, of course, I realize that all of the problems I had were because of endo. When The Husband got out of the Navy, we settled into our lives and went about the business of making babies. Only, I just couldn't seem to do what came naturally to most of the women I knew. It took us five years into our marriage before we had The Oldest--partly due to the endo. (Some of the problem was The Husband and me being apart for long periods of time, but that was only part of the problem.) After having our first child, I didn't have ANY relief from my symptoms as the one doctor said I would. And once again, I suffered from infertility problems--it took SIX years for The Youngest to come along. For most of the time that we tried to get pregnant, we didn't use birth control, thus the reason I say I suffered with infertility. As it turns out, the doctor who did my hysterectomy said I was lucky to ever have gotten pregnant even one time--infertility is one of the results many women suffer with having endometriosis.
By the time The Youngest was five, I was not living a 'normal' life. My monthly cycle was about 35 days long and for only a week out of those 35 days, I felt almost normal. The rest of the time I suffered with PMS and painful periods. And I mean SUFFERED. With two young girls to take care of, I couldn't completely take to my bed the seven days of my period, but I came close. Whenever K was home, he was in charge and I was in bed, in a fetal position, rocking back and forth, trying not to moan because of the pain I was in. At times I thought I was hemorrhaging because the flow was so heavy. I could barely walk because my thighs were so weak and sore and my lower belly was distended and throbbing. It felt as if all of my body parts were about to be discharged from my vagina because of the pressure I experienced in my pelvic 'floor'. And these were the 'good' days. (joking) During my non-period, bad days, I had breasts that swelled like footballs and felt as if they would burst open if they were touched--and they hurt. I had a painful, bloated belly and leg pain. My moods were extremely erratic. PMS to the nth degree was the order of the day. And every month, things seemed to get a little worse and I had had enough.
Finally, the pain and problems got to a point that I couldn't go on living with them, so I decided to try talking to a doctor one more time about what was going on. I had never told my GYN the extent of my problems before because no doctor had ever done much to help me previously. But, with this appointment, I decided I wasn't going to leave until I had some answers and a possible solution. As I started to read down my list of symptoms, the doctor joined me and finished the list without ever having read what I had written. He said I had a classic, text-book case of endometriosis. To be sure, he was going to do a laparoscopy on me to make the final diagnosis, but he had no problem with diagnosing me before the surgery. And then we discussed solutions. He said he could put me on medication that was proving to be helpful, but the side-effects were not fun. (Weight gain--possibly to the extreme--was only one of the side effects.) Or he could do laser surgery to remove the 'bad' tissue--the only problem with that is he could not be sure of getting all of the endometrial tissue, as it has a tendency to travel throughout the body in women with endo. Or he could do a hysterectomy. This would--in all likelihood--completely cure me of my problems. Removal of the ovaries--and the stopping of estrogen production by the body--was the only 'cure' that he would come close to guaranteeing. (Some women don't find this as the answer to their endo--they can't tolerate the hormone replacement therapy I went on.) Even though I left his office knowing that I would be getting a second opinion and doing some thinking about what he had to say, I knew in my heart of hearts that I WAS going to get the surgery. As I told him during my follow-up visit, "I'm done using the lady parts, so we might as well get rid of them."
Since having this surgery done, I have become addicted to The Gore and have done a lot of research into how other women have and do cope with endo and hysterectomies. Solutions to endo are pretty much the same as they were when I had my hysterectomy, but far fewer hysterectomies are being done--and more people are frowning on the solution. While it IS an extreme solution to a problem that may not be life-threatening, that doesn't seem to be the reason so many are against the practice. I guess a lot of women feel 'castrated' and less of a woman once a hysterectomy has been done. They seem to define themselves by how many lady parts they have. This is a mind set that I cannot understand. I'm not condemning anyone who feels this way, it just doesn't make sense to me. A couple of months after my surgery, when I was feeling better than I had felt at any point in my life, I told someone that I would have had the surgery done ten years earlier if it wouldn't have meant not having The Youngest. I cannot imagine my life if I wouldn't have done the surgery--and I don't feel any less of a woman because I have no uterus or ovaries. Yes, I've had to take a pill every day since the surgery, but as I get older, pills are just a way of life for me--as is the case with a lot of older people. The HRT hasn't been a factor in any health issues I have and, despite what some reports MIGHT indicate, I feel as if it has helped me. Given the chance again, I would choose to have a hysterectomy in a heartbeat--it was the best decision I ever made for my health.
I do hope that every woman faced with having to make the decision of whether to have a hysterectomy or not would do a lot of research and get both sides of the story. Too many people are condemning hysterectomies as too extreme--even likening them to misogyny on the part of male doctors. While I don't believe that, to each his--or her--own. I just beg any woman to do a great amount of research before making any decisions, don't buy into any 'politically correct' ideas just because, and make up your own mind without being influenced by others. It is YOUR body and YOU have to live with it. And if God created you a woman, just because some of your lady parts are gone, that doesn't change who, or what, you are.
*A couple of years ago I needed to have follow-up mams and ultrasounds of my right breast. There was a cyst--which they had been tracking for several years--that was larger than it had been and they wanted to make sure nothing was going to come of it. By the time I had my follow-up, the cyst had gone back to the size it had been and there was no need for any more action, other than some extra mams to make sure everything was status quo. I have had no more scares since.
From what I understand, many women have a hard time going for mammograms. Some women are very emotional about the experience--The Mother cries like a baby, for example. Other women have a great deal of pain having the procedure done--my friend with the tiny boobies suffers greatly with the stretching of the skin. For me, the entire ordeal is quite routine and I never have had an entirely negative experience. (Now, I'm not saying that it is pleasant, by any means, it's just that I don't suffer a lot having this done.) I guess one of the things that has made this a process that I don't worry about is the fact I have only had one 'problem'* with a mammogram in all of the years I've had them done.
After having my annual 'squeeze,' I DO find myself thinking 'what if' until I get the 'all good' report. Of course, I've never been faced with deciding what to do in the case of breast cancer--or, thank God, ANY cancer--but I think about it from time to time. While many women tell their doctors to do everything that can be done to save their breast, I think I would go the opposite way and say "Get rid of the damn thing and make sure all of the cancer is GONE!" I'm not afraid to die--I got into this a few posts ago--but I am terrified of dying in pain. Cancer causes pain.
I've never sat down and had a heart-to-heart talk with a breast cancer survivor. I admire anyone who has battled through cancer and I would never judge, but for me, I cannot understand wanting to save a body part over a fool proof complete cure. But, some women feel as if their womanhood is somewhat diminished if some of their 'lady bits' go missing. Again, I'm not judging, it's just that I can't comprehend that. And I only have my own life to use as a gauge when I think about it.
At the age of 34, I decided to have a hysterectomy. I began having periods about the age of 11 or 12 and every year brought more problems with my reproductive system. I was the poster girl for bad, painful periods. In high school, there were times when I had to leave school because I was in such pain--and it wasn't anything I could hide. I would turn pale and find myself praying to the porcelain gods, heaving my guts out. Of course, this wasn't EVERY month. I could go several months with a fairly 'normal' period--just long enough to think I was getting better--and then I would get blasted all over again. Going to doctors didn't help much. I was given many different pain pills and one doctor even put me on amphetamines. Nothing helped. The only relief I ever got was when I'd find myself in the ER and the doctor ordered Demerol injections--that's goooood drugs. Of course, I couldn't be on Demerol every month, so the relief was short-lived. Finally, I was put on birth control pills. Everything changed for me then--and the biggest change was NO PAIN! I thought I had found the Holy Grail and I was ecstatic. For six months. And the pain started to come back. Going back to what was 'normal' for me came very gradually, but it was apparent that The Pill wasn't going to be my cure-all and I decided to quit taking it. This then brought me an entirely new set of problems. After I went off of The Pill, I would go for three months or so at a time without a period. To bring it on, I had to go to the doctor and get a prescription--if I wasn't pregnant, I'd get my period and if I WAS, then nothing would happen. With The Husband away sailing the Seven Seas, there was no chance of a pregnancy, so I took the pills. This happened to me after each of the two times in my life when I was on birth control pills--and it took me at least a year each time to get back to my 'normal' cycle after going off of the pills. It wasn't a fun time for me, at all.
Early on, the diagnosis of 'endometriosis' was suggested by a doctor. The only thing he told me was that everything would get better once I had gone through a pregnancy. And nothing more was said. I didn't think much more about this and without the interwebs available like they are now, I didn't have a place where I could do any research into this problem. I just tried to learn to live with it. Now, of course, I realize that all of the problems I had were because of endo. When The Husband got out of the Navy, we settled into our lives and went about the business of making babies. Only, I just couldn't seem to do what came naturally to most of the women I knew. It took us five years into our marriage before we had The Oldest--partly due to the endo. (Some of the problem was The Husband and me being apart for long periods of time, but that was only part of the problem.) After having our first child, I didn't have ANY relief from my symptoms as the one doctor said I would. And once again, I suffered from infertility problems--it took SIX years for The Youngest to come along. For most of the time that we tried to get pregnant, we didn't use birth control, thus the reason I say I suffered with infertility. As it turns out, the doctor who did my hysterectomy said I was lucky to ever have gotten pregnant even one time--infertility is one of the results many women suffer with having endometriosis.
By the time The Youngest was five, I was not living a 'normal' life. My monthly cycle was about 35 days long and for only a week out of those 35 days, I felt almost normal. The rest of the time I suffered with PMS and painful periods. And I mean SUFFERED. With two young girls to take care of, I couldn't completely take to my bed the seven days of my period, but I came close. Whenever K was home, he was in charge and I was in bed, in a fetal position, rocking back and forth, trying not to moan because of the pain I was in. At times I thought I was hemorrhaging because the flow was so heavy. I could barely walk because my thighs were so weak and sore and my lower belly was distended and throbbing. It felt as if all of my body parts were about to be discharged from my vagina because of the pressure I experienced in my pelvic 'floor'. And these were the 'good' days. (joking) During my non-period, bad days, I had breasts that swelled like footballs and felt as if they would burst open if they were touched--and they hurt. I had a painful, bloated belly and leg pain. My moods were extremely erratic. PMS to the nth degree was the order of the day. And every month, things seemed to get a little worse and I had had enough.
Finally, the pain and problems got to a point that I couldn't go on living with them, so I decided to try talking to a doctor one more time about what was going on. I had never told my GYN the extent of my problems before because no doctor had ever done much to help me previously. But, with this appointment, I decided I wasn't going to leave until I had some answers and a possible solution. As I started to read down my list of symptoms, the doctor joined me and finished the list without ever having read what I had written. He said I had a classic, text-book case of endometriosis. To be sure, he was going to do a laparoscopy on me to make the final diagnosis, but he had no problem with diagnosing me before the surgery. And then we discussed solutions. He said he could put me on medication that was proving to be helpful, but the side-effects were not fun. (Weight gain--possibly to the extreme--was only one of the side effects.) Or he could do laser surgery to remove the 'bad' tissue--the only problem with that is he could not be sure of getting all of the endometrial tissue, as it has a tendency to travel throughout the body in women with endo. Or he could do a hysterectomy. This would--in all likelihood--completely cure me of my problems. Removal of the ovaries--and the stopping of estrogen production by the body--was the only 'cure' that he would come close to guaranteeing. (Some women don't find this as the answer to their endo--they can't tolerate the hormone replacement therapy I went on.) Even though I left his office knowing that I would be getting a second opinion and doing some thinking about what he had to say, I knew in my heart of hearts that I WAS going to get the surgery. As I told him during my follow-up visit, "I'm done using the lady parts, so we might as well get rid of them."
Since having this surgery done, I have become addicted to The Gore and have done a lot of research into how other women have and do cope with endo and hysterectomies. Solutions to endo are pretty much the same as they were when I had my hysterectomy, but far fewer hysterectomies are being done--and more people are frowning on the solution. While it IS an extreme solution to a problem that may not be life-threatening, that doesn't seem to be the reason so many are against the practice. I guess a lot of women feel 'castrated' and less of a woman once a hysterectomy has been done. They seem to define themselves by how many lady parts they have. This is a mind set that I cannot understand. I'm not condemning anyone who feels this way, it just doesn't make sense to me. A couple of months after my surgery, when I was feeling better than I had felt at any point in my life, I told someone that I would have had the surgery done ten years earlier if it wouldn't have meant not having The Youngest. I cannot imagine my life if I wouldn't have done the surgery--and I don't feel any less of a woman because I have no uterus or ovaries. Yes, I've had to take a pill every day since the surgery, but as I get older, pills are just a way of life for me--as is the case with a lot of older people. The HRT hasn't been a factor in any health issues I have and, despite what some reports MIGHT indicate, I feel as if it has helped me. Given the chance again, I would choose to have a hysterectomy in a heartbeat--it was the best decision I ever made for my health.
I do hope that every woman faced with having to make the decision of whether to have a hysterectomy or not would do a lot of research and get both sides of the story. Too many people are condemning hysterectomies as too extreme--even likening them to misogyny on the part of male doctors. While I don't believe that, to each his--or her--own. I just beg any woman to do a great amount of research before making any decisions, don't buy into any 'politically correct' ideas just because, and make up your own mind without being influenced by others. It is YOUR body and YOU have to live with it. And if God created you a woman, just because some of your lady parts are gone, that doesn't change who, or what, you are.
*A couple of years ago I needed to have follow-up mams and ultrasounds of my right breast. There was a cyst--which they had been tracking for several years--that was larger than it had been and they wanted to make sure nothing was going to come of it. By the time I had my follow-up, the cyst had gone back to the size it had been and there was no need for any more action, other than some extra mams to make sure everything was status quo. I have had no more scares since.
Monday, February 21, 2011
Once Broken, They Never Heal
Luckily, I have only broken one bone in my life--at least, that I know of. And that bone was in the smallest toe of my right foot. This took place more than 25 years ago, when The Youngest was a baby. I had just put her down in the crib for a nap and I had to rush out of the room to get to the bathroom. (I'm ALWAYS rushing to the bathroom--just one of my 'normal' habits.) As I was running into the bathroom, my little toe caught on the door jam and I heard a very loud 'crack.' Immediately I knew the toe was broken. There was no displacement of bones, but the pain was quite extensive and it began to darken within minutes. I knew I needed to get to the hospital for an x-ray, but K was working. He needed to be called home to drive me to the ER and I had to arrange for someone to watch the girls. By the time I actually got a doctor to see my foot, an hour had passed. The x-ray confirmed my diagnosis. Of course, there is very little that doctors will do for a simple, broken toe. I was sent home with instructions to 'buddy tape' the toe--that is, put tape around the broken one and the one next to it, so that the break would be stabilized. And I then waited for the healing process to complete. They don't tell you that broken bones never heal.
As I get older, I realize more frequently that my toe just isn't 'right.' While I don't have the weather-predicting ability that some people do, my toe will let me know when there will be some sort of change. Last week, during our February thaw, my toe was SCREAMING at me that change was coming. Honestly, it felt as if I had a toothache in my toe--it just throbbed constantly. I told K that we were in for some mighty bad weather and should prepare. And change certainly came--except it wasn't what I expected. The 'big' change turned out to be a drop in temperature. A majority of the mid-west got BLASTED with big-time snow and we only got a drop in temps. That is all. I'm really quite disappointed, as something more should have come from the pain I was in. I guess I won't rely on the 'broken-toe' method of predicting weather changes.
As I get older, I realize more frequently that my toe just isn't 'right.' While I don't have the weather-predicting ability that some people do, my toe will let me know when there will be some sort of change. Last week, during our February thaw, my toe was SCREAMING at me that change was coming. Honestly, it felt as if I had a toothache in my toe--it just throbbed constantly. I told K that we were in for some mighty bad weather and should prepare. And change certainly came--except it wasn't what I expected. The 'big' change turned out to be a drop in temperature. A majority of the mid-west got BLASTED with big-time snow and we only got a drop in temps. That is all. I'm really quite disappointed, as something more should have come from the pain I was in. I guess I won't rely on the 'broken-toe' method of predicting weather changes.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
My Romantic Husband
There we were, the week before Valentine's Day, shopping in Hobby Lobby. K came up to me and asked what size ring I wear. While I couldn't figure out why he asked, my mind wandered a bit: We were going to the mall later and there WERE jewelry stores there. I got a slight thrill over how romantic my husband is. And then he lead me to an aisle and showed me these:
GOTTA love him. :D
GOTTA love him. :D
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Obamacare?
EDITED: I edited this to reflect the fact that I found out that the insurance in question was our car insurance, NOT our home-owner's insurance.
Our vehicle insurance bill came a week or so ago and it had gone up $250. WTF!?!?!? Today, K got a call from the insurer's rep. The rep wanted to know if K had health insurance. He said he did, from work. Then the rep said that our car insurance had gone up the $250 because the insurer added the amount to compensate for the possibility of us not having health insurance. So, because we DID have health coverage, our bill will drop $250, as it wasn't needed.
Here are my questions about all of this: Does this have anything to do with Obamacare? Are other insurers going to be charging us a higher premium if we don't have our own health insurance--for example, homeowner's insurance? Or is this something new that just was put into effect? I guess these questions will be answered when K goes in to the company to have a sit-down with the rep, but I thought I would put this out there for my readers to discuss. I am really confused and would like to know what is going on.
Our vehicle insurance bill came a week or so ago and it had gone up $250. WTF!?!?!? Today, K got a call from the insurer's rep. The rep wanted to know if K had health insurance. He said he did, from work. Then the rep said that our car insurance had gone up the $250 because the insurer added the amount to compensate for the possibility of us not having health insurance. So, because we DID have health coverage, our bill will drop $250, as it wasn't needed.
Here are my questions about all of this: Does this have anything to do with Obamacare? Are other insurers going to be charging us a higher premium if we don't have our own health insurance--for example, homeowner's insurance? Or is this something new that just was put into effect? I guess these questions will be answered when K goes in to the company to have a sit-down with the rep, but I thought I would put this out there for my readers to discuss. I am really confused and would like to know what is going on.
Thursday, February 10, 2011
I Would Own A Gun, But...
We just got back from a several day road trip. While this doesn't REALLY have much to do with the rest of this post, I must give a little update on what we did. This was our trip to go and see the play 'Wicked.' I have only one word for the experience: WOW!!! Words just aren't enough to say how much I enjoyed the play and performances--ESPECIALLY the performances. I'm not sure I would have loved this as much if the part of the Wicked Witch would have been played by someone other than the girl who was in Tuesday's performance, because she was absolutely amazing. I don't know when I have heard such a powerful voice come out of such a (relatively) tiny body. But, this amazing time began with our traveling and my wanting to own a gun...
I've said on more than one occasion that there are two reasons why K won't 'let' me own a gun. First, he'd be very afraid that he wouldn't see his next birthday if I had a gun at my disposal and, two, if I didn't do him in, he would be afraid that I would leave a long line of drivers dead by the side of the road. And Monday gave me a good indication of how right he is to be afraid--some drivers don't deserve to LIVE, much less have licenses.
I sleep whenever we travel. It all started when I was kid and had car sickness: The sleeping helped keep me from getting nauseous. Sleeping had/has become such a habit with me, that I continue to do it to this day. I have told K that I HAVE to sleep because he makes me so nervous with his driving--and he IS a good driver, I'm just a nervous passenger. I found out on Monday that I need to sleep just so I don't have to experience the OTHER drivers on the road. I usually sleep until we are within a mile of our destination, but on Monday I woke much earlier than usual, so I got to see what goes on when I'm passed out. And it was more than a little frightening. As I was stretching and attempting to clear the cobwebs from my sleepy mind, I began to pay attention to what was going on around us. And there are some drivers--most?--who should not be on the road. This is what I saw in a mile-long stretch as we were racing down the interstate at 70+ MPH...
I've said on more than one occasion that there are two reasons why K won't 'let' me own a gun. First, he'd be very afraid that he wouldn't see his next birthday if I had a gun at my disposal and, two, if I didn't do him in, he would be afraid that I would leave a long line of drivers dead by the side of the road. And Monday gave me a good indication of how right he is to be afraid--some drivers don't deserve to LIVE, much less have licenses.
I sleep whenever we travel. It all started when I was kid and had car sickness: The sleeping helped keep me from getting nauseous. Sleeping had/has become such a habit with me, that I continue to do it to this day. I have told K that I HAVE to sleep because he makes me so nervous with his driving--and he IS a good driver, I'm just a nervous passenger. I found out on Monday that I need to sleep just so I don't have to experience the OTHER drivers on the road. I usually sleep until we are within a mile of our destination, but on Monday I woke much earlier than usual, so I got to see what goes on when I'm passed out. And it was more than a little frightening. As I was stretching and attempting to clear the cobwebs from my sleepy mind, I began to pay attention to what was going on around us. And there are some drivers--most?--who should not be on the road. This is what I saw in a mile-long stretch as we were racing down the interstate at 70+ MPH...
- The first driver I noticed was hugging the center line and I pointed her out to K, while telling him to watch out. As we passed her, I saw she was fixing her hair as she drove down the highway. Now, she wasn't just moving her hair around, she was fluffing and combing and straightening and patting her hair with BOTH hands. WITHOUT any hands on the steering wheel. No wonder she couldn't keep the car moving in a straight line.
- The very next car we passed was being driven by a guy, who I am CONVINCED is a serial killer. I SWEAR, when he glanced at me, that I saw flames shoot out of his eyeballs. And I KNOW he would've ended my life with just a little more than a look, if he wanted. I'm completely sure his picture is hanging in the post office...he was very, very scary.
- And finally, the third car we passed was being driven by a guy, also. Now, 'driven' probably isn't the proper term for what he was doing, because I have no idea HOW he was steering this vehicle. The first thing I noticed about him was that he had an iPad in his left hand and he was reading it. Yeah, while going down the highway. BUT that wasn't all. He also had a cellphone squished between his right ear and shoulder and was talking on it. And it gets better. He was WRITING on a pad of paper with his right hand. I know, I MUST have seen wrong. Nope. I looked more than once just to make sure I saw what I saw and didn't imagine it. I have no idea how he steered the car--and I don't know if I WANT to know.
Friday, February 04, 2011
That Purple, Padded Room IS In My Future
I've been sitting here in the computer room surfing The Gore and doing all of my 'regular' stuff on this machine. K is sleeping on the couch--he is working night shift--and I am trying to be as quiet as possible. That is why I'm in the computer room and not vacuuming, for example. While K WILL sleep through just about anything, I usually don't do much more than have the TV on when he's sleeping off a night shift. That is why I was completely baffled by what has been happening.
While sitting here, I have been hearing 'noises'--like people talking or the cat meowing. (I know, cats don't sound like people, but you've never met my cat.) So, I went exploring to see if I had left the TV on in the kitchen, or if K turned the one on in the living room, or if the cat is getting ready to hack up a hairball and is announcing such. And I found: Nothing. Nada. Absolutely no noises at all. I MUST be losing my mind--and that just means that I WILL be sitting in that purple, padded room very soon in the future.
While sitting here, I have been hearing 'noises'--like people talking or the cat meowing. (I know, cats don't sound like people, but you've never met my cat.) So, I went exploring to see if I had left the TV on in the kitchen, or if K turned the one on in the living room, or if the cat is getting ready to hack up a hairball and is announcing such. And I found: Nothing. Nada. Absolutely no noises at all. I MUST be losing my mind--and that just means that I WILL be sitting in that purple, padded room very soon in the future.
Using Computers and The Interwebs
If you are reading this, then you probably know how to use the interwebs. And if you are reading this, you probably know how to use computers. And if both of the previous sentences are true, you more likely than not have been asked by someone to find the answer to a question by using the interwebs. A question they can find the answer to themselves, simply by using Google. And that is why so many computer users--geeks, as well as 'normal' people--get livid when asked to 'find' answers.
I LOVE my computer. While I'm not a total geek, I tend towards that description. I'm not quite as computer-savvy as I used to be--a few years ago I KNEW I could build my own computer, but I'm not so sure these days. That being said, I do have a knowledge that a lot of my friends and family don't. I don't mind being asked to look up information for people--especially those who don't have computers or lack the experience I have. I've often thought that I could make money by doing searches for others, but setting something like that up would actually take time and effort, neither of which I'm willing to do. So, I will be content to search for houses to rent in the southwest for my sister-in-law and look to see if the knife The Husband wants is still being manufactured. I have the time to do these things and it doesn't really take away from what I may WANT to do. However...
I do have a problem when someone asks me to find out 'why is the sky blue?' or any simple, easily Googled question such as that. I also have a problem when someone asks me to do a search for them, but THEY are on the computer themselves for 20 hours of every day. EXCUSE ME!?!?!? And just why can't you do it yourself? And, obviously, many people feel the same as I do, because there is a site that has been developed called 'Let Me Google That For You'--http://lmgtfy.com/. This is for those people who find it more convenient to bother you with their question than Google it for themselves. It is an easy to use, step-by-step course in how to use Google to get the answers you are seeking. So, if you don't want to pass on this link whenever someone asks you a simple question, make sure you say--in your MOST sarcastic voice--"Just wait a second and let me Google that for you." It might help, but I doubt it.
I LOVE my computer. While I'm not a total geek, I tend towards that description. I'm not quite as computer-savvy as I used to be--a few years ago I KNEW I could build my own computer, but I'm not so sure these days. That being said, I do have a knowledge that a lot of my friends and family don't. I don't mind being asked to look up information for people--especially those who don't have computers or lack the experience I have. I've often thought that I could make money by doing searches for others, but setting something like that up would actually take time and effort, neither of which I'm willing to do. So, I will be content to search for houses to rent in the southwest for my sister-in-law and look to see if the knife The Husband wants is still being manufactured. I have the time to do these things and it doesn't really take away from what I may WANT to do. However...
I do have a problem when someone asks me to find out 'why is the sky blue?' or any simple, easily Googled question such as that. I also have a problem when someone asks me to do a search for them, but THEY are on the computer themselves for 20 hours of every day. EXCUSE ME!?!?!? And just why can't you do it yourself? And, obviously, many people feel the same as I do, because there is a site that has been developed called 'Let Me Google That For You'--http://lmgtfy.com/. This is for those people who find it more convenient to bother you with their question than Google it for themselves. It is an easy to use, step-by-step course in how to use Google to get the answers you are seeking. So, if you don't want to pass on this link whenever someone asks you a simple question, make sure you say--in your MOST sarcastic voice--"Just wait a second and let me Google that for you." It might help, but I doubt it.
Thursday, February 03, 2011
Winter Driving*
*OR, Get The F*** Off Of My Roads If You Don't Know How To Drive On Snow!
I live in the great north woods. We get snow. I have lived around snow my entire life, as I was born and raised 100 miles north of where I now live. From sometime in October until a time in (the earliest) late March, the roads have snow on them. That means, no dry pavement for about five months out of the year. This time period just happens to coincide with the school year, and that is where this story comes from.
'Back home' has a world-class engineering school. Students and teachers/professors come from all over the world to be part of the university. Of course, this means a great deal of culture shock for some of these people, as well as a very different way of living. Many, many of these people have never seen snow. This causes a number of problems. K's niece used to work at public safety at the school and told this story:
One morning a professor from India came in and--in his thick, Indian accent--said, "Need ID card."
The Niece: "Okay, you need a new ID card. Step this way and we'll get a new picture. What happened to your old card?"
Professor: "Got in car. Started car. Car wouldn't move. Tires spin. Got out of car. Put ID card under back tire. Got in car. Put car in gear, stepped on gas. And (adding hand gesture indicating flying motion, while looking off into the distance) 'FWINGGGG!', card went flying. So, need new ID card."
About this time, The Niece had to turn away from the professor so that he wouldn't see her laughing. She couldn't stop laughing. To this day, she doesn't know HOW she managed to complete the task of getting him his new ID card. This became one of the favorite stories around the public safety office.
I live in the great north woods. We get snow. I have lived around snow my entire life, as I was born and raised 100 miles north of where I now live. From sometime in October until a time in (the earliest) late March, the roads have snow on them. That means, no dry pavement for about five months out of the year. This time period just happens to coincide with the school year, and that is where this story comes from.
'Back home' has a world-class engineering school. Students and teachers/professors come from all over the world to be part of the university. Of course, this means a great deal of culture shock for some of these people, as well as a very different way of living. Many, many of these people have never seen snow. This causes a number of problems. K's niece used to work at public safety at the school and told this story:
One morning a professor from India came in and--in his thick, Indian accent--said, "Need ID card."
The Niece: "Okay, you need a new ID card. Step this way and we'll get a new picture. What happened to your old card?"
Professor: "Got in car. Started car. Car wouldn't move. Tires spin. Got out of car. Put ID card under back tire. Got in car. Put car in gear, stepped on gas. And (adding hand gesture indicating flying motion, while looking off into the distance) 'FWINGGGG!', card went flying. So, need new ID card."
About this time, The Niece had to turn away from the professor so that he wouldn't see her laughing. She couldn't stop laughing. To this day, she doesn't know HOW she managed to complete the task of getting him his new ID card. This became one of the favorite stories around the public safety office.
Bad, Bad Business
When I go into a business establishment, I don't demand much. I would like to be acknowledged--a smile, a 'Hi,' a 'May I help you?' is sufficient. I don't need anyone to hold my hand or be at my beck-and-call. And for my part, I will be a good customer. I don't ask for help until I have exhausted my own resources and brain power. I don't make demands or ask for what you can't provide. Actually, I may be one of the easiest people to please, as I don't want to be a bother--even if it involves nothing more than you doing your job. That is why today's experience just baffles me.
On our way home today, we stopped at our local Jimmy John's for sandwiches. With all of the restaurants and fast food joints in town, we haven't been to Jimmy John's all that often. Actually, this might have been only the third time I've had food from there since they opened a few years ago. Anyway, we decided to go in and order because we aren't that familiar with the menu and figured this would be easier. And our visit went like this:
On our way home today, we stopped at our local Jimmy John's for sandwiches. With all of the restaurants and fast food joints in town, we haven't been to Jimmy John's all that often. Actually, this might have been only the third time I've had food from there since they opened a few years ago. Anyway, we decided to go in and order because we aren't that familiar with the menu and figured this would be easier. And our visit went like this:
- We walked in and no one does anything but stare at us. As if we were cockroaches that crawled out from under the counter.
- After deciding what we wanted, we walked up to the counter and placed the order. No one STILL had said anything to us. The first time we were spoken to was when we were told how much we owed.
- After paying, we stepped back and waited for our food to be prepared. The next words spoken 'to' us was when the numbers of our sandwiches were announced. Assuming our order was finished, K went to the counter, picked up our sandwiches, and we left. And no one still had said anything to us.
Tuesday, February 01, 2011
Six Degrees
There is the theory that every person can be linked to every other person in the world by only six steps. While I don't know how true this is, I DO know that my mind can usually take me from one subject to another completely unrelated one in about six steps--and I do it ALL of the time.
The other night while in the shower, I found myself thinking about the blood orange I had eaten earlier. And as is my regular way of doing things, my mind went wandering on its own for a few seconds and the next thing I realized was that I was thinking about my first love. WTF?!?!?!?! So I decided to figure out HOW I got from blood oranges to a guy I think about very, very rarely. And this is what I came up with:
I discussed this with The Oldest and she said she is exactly like this--and her husband can't comprehend how anyone's brain works like this. He said she is like a computer with multiple processors that work at the same time. I guess that is as good of an explanation as any. I'm not sure if this is unique to only certain people or is this a 'woman thing?' Does anyone have thoughts?
The other night while in the shower, I found myself thinking about the blood orange I had eaten earlier. And as is my regular way of doing things, my mind went wandering on its own for a few seconds and the next thing I realized was that I was thinking about my first love. WTF?!?!?!?! So I decided to figure out HOW I got from blood oranges to a guy I think about very, very rarely. And this is what I came up with:
Blood oranges-------->Florida-------->The South-------->South Carolina-------->The Navy-------->Military/Air Force-------->First Love (who was in the Air Force when we got together)
I discussed this with The Oldest and she said she is exactly like this--and her husband can't comprehend how anyone's brain works like this. He said she is like a computer with multiple processors that work at the same time. I guess that is as good of an explanation as any. I'm not sure if this is unique to only certain people or is this a 'woman thing?' Does anyone have thoughts?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Disquis
Being In a Funk
I'm still having a bit of a funk going on in my life. To be expected, I guess. But, it REALLY is affecting me to see my best friend ...
-
My inbox has been so very stuffed full of spam comments that I had to change the settings for comments. No longer will anonymous comments b...
-
Does anyone remember the show Name That Tune ? It was a game show where the contestants tried to name songs with the least amount of notes ...
-
I think this may be one of the best descriptions of love/marriage I have ever seen. Funny, but true! :D




